I have calculated that I have tested quite a few cars for nvh engineering purposes.
If I add a few different engine variants to this, it makes quite an interesting list.
I tested on public roads and on test tracks at car manufacturers’ research and development centres. The cars did not have it easy, as some cycles required gyrating the engine….
Audi a6,
PEUGEOT partner,
Ford focus,
Ford mondeo,
Opel insignia,
Opel astra,
Opel corsa,
Jeep wrangler,
Jeep Grand Cherokee
Jeep cherokee,
Jeep renegade,
Fiat 500,
Fiat 500L,
Fiat Panda,
Landrover discovery,
Range Rover Evoque,
Range Rover velar,
Jaguar xe,
Jaguar xf,
Jaguar f pace,
Citroën DS4.
automotive
Intuitive creative process vs algorithms
🥱 Bored with “Lean” and “Six Sigma” – methods common in Automotive, I was looking for knowledge on how to approach problem solving innovatively. Methodological optimization and “nibbling” percentages is not always the right solution, when it’s begging to be “turned upside down”. My creative approach in problem solving was ‘somehow’ intuitive, based on ‘some’ experience, being ‘somehow’ more open to solutions and ‘somehow’ having flashes of ideas. Often this approach led me to come up with ‘some’ solution. However, I was also often left with an idea and the thought “what next?”.